Improving Digital Publishing of Legal Scholarship

Intellectual Voyeurism in Legal Scholarship

Bounded Rationality and Legal Scholarship

Legal Scholarship and the Practice of Law

Redirecting Legal Scholarship in Law Schools

Yale Law School Legal Scholarship Repository

The Supreme Court’s affirmative action decisions in Grutter v. Bollinger and Gratz v. Bollinger changed the meaning of “narrow tailoring.” While the narrow tailoring requirement has always had multiple dimensions, a central meaning has been that the government must use the smallest racial preference needed to achieve its compelling interest. We might have expected, therefore, that if the Court ...